@Article{MarengoMPRMNPGLKMGHSAHT:2017:InFrAn,
author = "Marengo, J. and Muller-Karger, F. and Pelling, M. and Reynolds, C.
J. and Merrill, S. B. and Nunes, L. H. and Paterson, S. and Gray,
A. J. and Lockman, J. T. and Kartez, J. and Moreira, F. A. and
Greco, R. and Harari, J. and Souza, C. R. G. and Alves, Lincoln
Muniz and Hosokawa, E. K. and Tabuchi, E. K.",
affiliation = "{Centro Nacional de Monitoramento e Alertas de Desastre Naturais
(CEMADEN)} and {University of South Florida} and {King’s College
London} and {University of South Florida} and {GEI Consultants
Inc} and {Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP)} and
{University College Cork} and {GEI Consultants Inc} and {GEI
Consultants Inc} and {University of Southern Maine} and
{Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP)} and {Universidade
Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP)} and {Universidade de S{\~a}o
Paulo (USP)} and {Geological Institute of S{\~a}o Paulo} and
{Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas Espaciais (INPE)}",
title = "An integrated framework to analyze local decision making and
adaptation to sea level rise in coastal regions in Selsey (UK),
Broward County (USA), and Santos (Brazil)",
journal = "American Journal of Climate Change",
year = "2017",
volume = "6",
number = "2",
pages = "403--424",
keywords = "Sea Level Rise, Vulnerability, Adaptation, Impacts, Climate
Change.",
abstract = "One of the clear signals of the ongoing climate change is sea
level rise (SLR). Normal oceanic tides superimposed on a rising
sea level and coastal flooding will affect many coastal
communities. An international collaboration among Brazil, the
United Kingdom, and the United States was designed to evaluate
local decision making processes and to open space for local urban
managers to reflect on possible actions toward adaption to sea
level rise given the historical constraints imposed by
administrative and institutional structures. This project focused
on the processes that shape adaptation of three coastal
communities in three countries. It worked jointly with these
communities in defining the problem, examining risks, and
understanding the benefits and obstacles that may hinder
implementation of adaptation options. The framework was
co-designed by an interdisciplinary team that incorporated social
and natural scientists from the three countries, including local
government officials. The study addressed 1) evaluation of
adaptive capacity through participant surveys and 2) physical and
cost impact simulations using geospatial models of the built
infrastructure and implementation of adaptation options under
different hazard scenarios, including 50 and 100-year sea level
rise projections and severe storms. Based on the surveys results,
there is a clear sense of the awareness of each community of the
risk of floods due to intense storms, and of the usefulness of
engaging early in a process that promotes the understanding of
risks, impacts, and costs. A majority of workshop participants
prioritized pursuing physical and green infrastructure actions now
or within coming years or decades. A positive common aspect of the
three sites was the commitment shown by the stakeholders in taking
part in the process and evaluating which adaptation measures could
be more effective in their cities. While in the US and UK
structural solutions and voluntary buyouts were prioritized for
the future, Brazil prioritized structural solutions and ecosystems
restoration and not voluntary buyouts. All of these are choices to
increase resiliency against sea level rise that have a high
benefit-cost ratio. The Adaptive Capacity Index (ACI) results
illustrate barriers to adaptation action, including technical,
economic and political issues that reveal inequalities in adaptive
capacity among case studies.",
issn = "2167-9495 and 2167-9509",
language = "en",
targetfile = "marengo.pdf",
urlaccessdate = "28 abr. 2024"
}